Should You Buy a Buy-to-Let Property Personally or Through a Limited Company?
- Vincent Mak
- Feb 18
- 3 min read

Investing in buy-to-let property can be a profitable venture, but one of the most important decisions landlords face is whether to purchase the property personally or through a limited company. Each option comes with its own advantages and disadvantages, and the right choice depends on your financial goals, tax position, and long-term strategy.
The Key Differences Between Personal and Limited Company Ownership
Taxation Considerations
One of the main reasons landlords consider buying a buy-to-let property through a limited company is the tax advantages. If you purchase the property personally, rental income is subject to income tax at your marginal rate. However, limited companies pay corporation tax, which is typically lower than the higher and additional income tax bands.
Mortgage Availability and Interest Rates
Lenders offer different mortgage products for individual landlords and limited companies. Generally, buy-to-let mortgages for limited companies come with higher interest rates and fewer options compared to personal mortgages.
Limited Liability Protection
Buying a property through a limited company offers limited liability, meaning your personal assets are protected if the business faces financial difficulties. Personal ownership does not offer this protection, leaving landlords personally liable for any debts or legal claims.
Pros and Cons of Buying Through a Limited Company
Pros:
Tax Efficiency: Corporation tax rates are lower than higher-rate income tax bands.
Limited Liability: Your personal assets are protected from business-related financial risks.
Reinvestment Benefits: Profits can be retained in the company and reinvested without immediate income tax liabilities.
Cons:
Higher Mortgage Rates: Limited company buy-to-let mortgages often come with higher interest rates.
Additional Administrative Costs: Running a limited company involves extra legal and accounting responsibilities.
Capital Gains Tax Considerations: Selling property within a limited company can result in corporation tax and dividend tax when withdrawing profits.
Pros and Cons of Buying Personally
Pros:
Wider Mortgage Options: More competitive mortgage products with lower interest rates.
Simpler Tax Reporting: No need for additional company tax filings or accounting fees.
Easier Property Transfers: Transferring ownership is more straightforward compared to a corporate structure.
Cons:
Higher Income Tax on Rental Profits: If you're a higher-rate taxpayer, your rental income will be taxed at a higher rate.
Limited Liability Risks: Personal assets could be at risk in case of financial or legal issues.
Restricted Tax Deductibility of Mortgage Interest: Mortgage interest relief is limited compared to a company structure.
Buy a Buy-to-Let Property Personally or Through a Limited Company - Which Option Is Right for You?
The decision to buy a buy-to-let property personally or through a limited company depends on various factors, including your tax position, investment strategy, and financial goals. If you plan to reinvest rental profits and build a property portfolio, a limited company structure may be more tax-efficient. On the other hand, if you’re a small-scale landlord or prefer a simpler process, buying personally may be the better option.
Before making a decision, it’s crucial to consult a financial advisor or mortgage expert. Our team at Possible Mortgages can help you understand the best option based on your unique circumstances. Contact us through our Contact Us page for expert guidance.
For more insights on mortgage and property investment strategies, explore our Knowledge Hub.
Your property may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments on your mortgage. Not all Buy to Let Mortgages are regulated by The Financial Conduct Authority.
Comments